Widal Test vs. Blood Culture: Which Is Better for Diagnosing Typhoid?

Typhoid fever is an acute systemic febrile illness caused by the bacterium Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) and predominantly occurs in low- and middle-income countries. Typhoid fever remains an active health problem in the world today, even with technological advancements in health care. The WHO estimates that there are approximately 11 to 20 million cases each year, and 128,000 to 161,000 deaths result from typhoid fever, primarily in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.

As could be deduced from this article, typhoid fever, if not diagnosed early, has serious complications, including intestinal perforation and peritonitis. This article focuses on two primary diagnostic methods: the widal test and blood culture.

We shall thereafter compare them based on the chosen parameters, such as sensitivity, specificity, cost, and clinical utility, in helping clinicians and patients make the right decisions in choosing the most appropriate diagnostic tool. Let’s get a clear understanding of the widal test vs. blood culture for typhoid in this article.

Typhoid fever is a generalized infection that occurs due to the bacterium Salmonella Typhi; the disease spreads through food or water-borne products. It usually reaches the bloodstream after having gone through the intestinal wall and, therefore, develops generalized systemic manifestations.

The typhoid-causing bacterium thrives in low standards of hygiene and contaminated water sources; consequently, typhoid fever prevails in many parts of the world, especially South Asia, Southeast Asia, and parts of Africa. 

S. Typhi, being an intracellular organism after gaining entry into the host’s bloodstream, is engulfed by macrophages of the immune system. It can reside within these immune cells to circulate through the body, and therefore, it is hard to clinically diagnose when infecting the liver, spleen, and bone marrow. Early diagnosis of typhoid fever is vital for the prevention of complications since the use of the proper diagnostic tool can sometimes result in a difference between life and death.

It takes between 6-30 days before an infected person develops signs and symptoms of typhoid fever. Mild signs at onset may include flank pain, nausea, vomiting, and dysuria, which may not be much diagnostic from other febrile diseases such as malaria or dengue.

• Fever: The fever is typically steeper, and the first step is usually higher than 105°F (40°C).
• Abdominal pain: Since the intestines have been inflamed, there is usually pain or discomfort in the abdomen.

• Headache: The symptoms include diarrhea, sore throat, high fever, and constant headaches that will not go away.

  
• Constipation/Diarrhea: In the initial phase of the disease, patients may have constipation; however, diarrhea is also characteristic of the disease, especially in children.
• Rose spots: In some patients, especially in white skin types, there are small pinkish spots on the trunk of the body.

• Fatigue and malaise: Fever and fatigue are two of the worst things in the human body, and they are often caused by a prolonged fever and a fatigued immune system.

In severe cases, untreated typhoid fever can cause complications such as:

• Intestinal perforation: This is where the inflamed intestine gets perforated, resulting in leakage of intestinal contents into the abdominal cavity and peritonitis.
• Sepsis: When bacteria penetrate the bloodstream, septicemia can occur, which is very dangerous if not addressed.

The Widal test is one of the agglutination assays that determine the levels of specific antibody-antigen reactions in blood sera responding to S. Typhi antigens. This test was developed by Georges Ferdinand Widal in the year 1896 and is still in use even though more modern tests have been developed, especially in areas where modern technology has not been used.

The test focuses on detecting two main types of antibodies:

• O Antibodies: These are antibodies that are against the somatic antigens (O antigen) of S. Typhi. That is why the elevation of O antibody titers is considered an indication of an acute infection.
• H Antibodies: These aim at the flagellar antigens (H antigen) of the bacteria. H antibodies may remain detectable for a more extended period, even after the suffering has recovered.

As for the Widal test, it only shows the amount of agglutinates formed and must not be confused with the amount of antibodies or antigens present. In the test, the patient’s serum is diluted in a series and then combined with standardized suspensions of S.

Typhi antigens (o and h antigens) The results are then interpreted based on the degree of agglutination observed. A rising titer in paired samples taken 10–14 days apart is indicative of a recent or ongoing infection. In some endemic areas, a single high-titer result may be considered suggestive of typhoid fever.

• Speed: The Widal test can be done in 24-48 hours; it can be useful to detect antibodies in the early stages of infection; however, forecasting the result of the infection is not possible.

• Cost-effectiveness: The test is cheap and simple and, therefore, suitable for adoption in countries that have limited health facilities and little money to spend.

• Ease of use: The test is quite easy and can be administered even in low-resource settings since it does not necessitate complex equipment or professional healthcare personnel.

• Low specificity: This shows that the Widal test has several drawbacks, including low specificity, especially in endemic areas. Chronic typhoid carriers or those with a history of vaccination against typhoid may continue to exhibit frank serological responses even in the absence of the disease.

• False positives and false negatives: The test commonly generates false positive results because of the cross-reaction with other bacteria, such as Salmonella species that cause paratyphoid fever and non-typhoidal Salmonellae. False negatives can happen in the early stages of the disease path when the body has not yet developed a powerful immune response, which is expressed through antibody production.

• Interpretation variability: Different people have different levels of antibodies, and there is no widely accepted standard or normal ranges for Widal test results across the world. This means that laboratories in different regions apply different cutoffs, making the results different.
• Not definitive: The Widal test does not confirm the presence of infection; it only raises suspicions based on the antibodies detected. This makes it a less sensitive diagnostic tool, particularly in areas where background immunity is high.

Blood cultures taken from the patients are deemed the most accurate way to diagnose typhoid fever. Compared to the Widal test, which looks for antibodies, the blood culture identifies the S. Typhi bacteria in the blood directly. This makes it the most definitive diagnostic method currently available.

A blood culture entails collecting a sample of the patient’s blood and installing it in an environment that supports the growth of bacteria. If the patient has an active typhoid infection, the bacteria will multiply, and the laboratory can then identify and confirm the presence of S. Typhi.

After taking a blood sample, it is put in bottles containing culture media, through which bacteria require nutrients for growth. The bottles are then left to incubate at 37 degrees centigrade for some days, several hours ranging from forty-eight to seventy-two hours. During this time, an increase in bacteria is observed.

If S. Typhi increases again, the bacteria are cultured, and the result is further subtyped by employing biochemical tests. Additional tests can also be conducted to determine the antibiotic sensitivity of the strain, which is important, especially for this strain.

• High specificity: Since blood culture isolates the actual cause, it is much more accurate than non-suppressive tests such as the Widal test. The key to accurately diagnosing typhoid fever in a patient is a positive result in S. typhi culture, which means that the patient has the disease.
• Antibiotic susceptibility testing: Blood culture can enable the determination of the antibiotic sensitivity of the bacterium. This is especially considered during areas with MDR strains of S. Typhi and marked by a higher level of resistance to drugs. This evidence may help clinicians select the appropriate antibiotic and thus enhance therapeutic efficacy.
• Definitive diagnosis: Blood culture is much easier in the diagnosis of the active infection than other tests, such as the Widal test, where the test result may only show the previous infection or exposure.

Time-consuming: The culture results from the blood that can be obtained, which is usually not immediate. Bacteria usually take about 48 to 72 hours to grow, and, in some instances, it will take 5-7 days. This delay is, again, not ideal, particularly for populations that require treatment as soon as possible for their health complications.

Sample collection timing: It also becomes useful in the initial stages of the disease when many bacteria are pumped out into the bloodstream. By the time the illness is one week old, the bacteria may not be present in the patient’s blood, hence lowering the reliability of the test.

False negatives: It is also very important to note that they may sometimes get false negatives if the patient has already taken antibiotics before sampling blood. Antibiotics can reduce the number of bacteria in the bloodstream, making it difficult to grow them in culture.

Cost and infrastructure: Blood cultures require specialized laboratory equipment, including incubators and culture media, as well as trained personnel to process the samples. This makes it more expensive and less accessible in rural or resource-poor settings.

Widal Test: The Widal test works differently in different places. In areas where many people have typhoid or have had it before, the test might not be very good. This is because people there already have some protection against the disease, and the test can mix up typhoid with other sicknesses. If someone is just getting sick with typhoid, the test might not show it because their body hasn’t made enough of the right stuff to show up in the test.

Blood Culture: Blood culture is better at finding the real cause of typhoid because it looks for the bacteria itself. If the bacteria is in the blood, the test will find it. But if someone took medicine (antibiotics) before the test, the bacteria might be gone, and the test won’t work. Also, if the person has had typhoid for a while, the bacteria might not be in their blood anymore, so the test might miss it.

Widal Test: The Widal test is fast. It can give results in a few hours. This makes it helpful when doctors need to find out quickly if someone might have typhoid, especially in places where they can’t do more complicated tests. But just because it’s fast doesn’t mean it’s always right.

Blood Culture: Blood culture takes longer. The bacteria need time to grow, so it can take 2 or 3 days to get the results. Sometimes, it can take even longer if the bacteria grow slowly. If someone is very sick, waiting for this test can be hard, so doctors might start treating them before the test results are ready.

Widal Test: The Widal test is cheap and easy to do. It doesn’t need fancy machines, so even small clinics or places far away from big cities can do it. The things needed for the test don’t cost a lot of money. This is why many people in poor areas use the Widal test to check for typhoid.

Blood Culture: Blood culture costs more and needs special tools. Hospitals need to have special machines and things to grow the bacteria. It also needs trained people to do the test. Because of this, blood culture is usually done in big hospitals or in cities. In small villages or faraway places, this test might not be possible.

Widal Test: The Widal test is used a lot in places where many people get typhoid. It is a good first test to see if someone might have typhoid. It’s quick and doesn’t cost much, so doctors can use it when they don’t have better tests. But because it can sometimes give wrong answers, doctors often do another test afterward to make sure. The Widal test is helpful but not always perfect.

Blood Culture: Blood culture is the best test to make sure someone has typhoid. Doctors use it when they want to know for sure. It is also very important to find out which medicine (antibiotics) will work. In places where the bacteria are hard to treat, this test helps doctors pick the right medicine. Even though it takes more time and money, blood culture is very useful for serious cases.

Interpretation of the Widal test in endemic areas is very complex due to the high prevalence of exposure to S. Typhi. It is also evident that many people may have high amounts of antibodies in their system because of past infections or immunizations, thus increasing the false-positive rate.

Clinicians in these areas, therefore, initially employ the Widal test but in the context of increasing antibody titers in titers in paired sera collected from 10 to 14 days apart. This is furthermore suggestive of an active infection rather than merely developing a single high titer result.

In endemic areas, the Widal test may be used together with clinical observations and a history of the disease or illness. This patient, with typical complaints of fever, abdominal pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms, may be subjected to the Widal test and started on empirical treatment, pending the results of other tests.

Blood culture is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosing typhoid fever in every study; however, it has several logistical drawbacks. Blood culture is less sensitive when carried out after the first week of illness, although its value is further reduced by prior antibiotic administration. False negatives may result from bacteria not being present in the bloodstream or due to natural antibiotic activity.

Further, blood cultures take up to 48–72 hours before they can indicate the presence of bacteria, which may hinder correct diagnosis and treatment. Such delays are critical in patients who require critical care, and often, clinicians are limited to their own clinical acumen or lightning-fast serological tests like Widal for initiating therapy.

However, blood culture is crucial in the detection of drug-resistant strains of S. Typhi, which has assumed endemicity in many parts of the world. Typhoid is rifampin-resistant, and standard antibiotic therapy for MDR and XDR typhoid involves blood culture with susceptibility testing.

Both the Widal test and blood culture are useful for diagnosing typhoid fever. Each has its pros and cons. The Widal test is good for quick screening, especially in places where money and resources are limited. But, it can sometimes give false results and be hard to interpret.

On the other hand, blood culture is more accurate. It can tell for sure if a person has typhoid and helps doctors choose the right antibiotics. However, it takes longer, costs more, and needs special equipment. This makes it harder to use in poorer areas.

The best approach is often to use both tests together. The Widal test can be used first for quick results, and then blood culture can confirm the diagnosis. This ensures the patient gets treatment as soon as possible and the diagnosis is accurate.

Which test is chosen depends on the healthcare setting, the patient’s symptoms, and what resources are available. Always consult a healthcare provider to ensure the right diagnosis and treatment.

Blood culture is considered the most accurate test for diagnosing typhoid fever.

Typhidot is generally preferred over the Widal test because it has higher specificity and quicker results.

Yes, blood cultures can detect Salmonella typhi, the bacteria that causes typhoid fever.

Blood culture is better than the Widal test for confirming typhoid fever due to its higher accuracy.

Yes, blood cultures can effectively detect typhoid by isolating the bacteria from a blood sample.

* Medical Disclaimer - The following information is for educational purposes only. No information provided on this website, including text, graphic, and images, are intended as substitutes for professional medical advice. Please consult with your doctor about specific medical advice pertaining to your condition(s).